Elliott Forum
141 results found
-
Do not allow Serialized Items to be received without serial numbers present
We have had the situation occur where bad data allowed a serialized item to be received without serial numbers being present. We do not know what caused the bad warehouse receiving data. Globally, a check should be put in place to stop the receiving of a serialized item if there are no, or not enough, serial numbers associated with the receiving.
3 votescompleted ·
AdminEdward M. Kwang - NETcellent System, Inc.
(CEO / Founder, NETcellent Systems, Inc.)
responded
We had changed the warehouse receiving edit list and posting to perform integrity check to ensure the total number of serial number match the quantity to be received. The changes will be available in the next Elliott revision update.
-
Restricted option to prevent selling below minimum price setting
We appreciate the warning when selling below the minimum selling price but there should be an option in the Global set up to lock this option in or still allow sellers to continue after they are warned. I understand its an internal management function but it would really save us time and money in the long run, it would be a valuable function for Elliott and something that we need. Please
3 votescompleted ·AdminEdward M. Kwang - NETcellent System, Inc.
(CEO / Founder, NETcellent Systems, Inc.)
responded
This feature will be available in the next Elliott release. See http://support.elliott.com/knowledgebase/articles/1843255-feature-add-prevent-entry-for-unit-price-when-be for more information about this feature.
-
Support Lot Number for COP Transfer Order
Currently, the COP Transfer Order support regular item and serialized item. But it does not support Lot Number.
3 votescompleted ·AdminEdward M. Kwang - NETcellent System, Inc.
(CEO / Founder, NETcellent Systems, Inc.)
responded
This project was completed and released in Elliott 7.56.308/8.06.308 release.
-
Support Paid Invoices on Expanded Aging Report
On A/R -> Reports -> Aging Reports -> Expanded, it currently does not support printing items that's fully paid. On the other hand, in the regular aging report, it supports the following prompt:
9. Show Open Items Only ?Can this prompt be added to the Expanded Aging Report?
3 votescompleted ·AdminEdward M. Kwang - NETcellent System, Inc.
(CEO / Founder, NETcellent Systems, Inc.)
responded
This feature is completed. It did not make it to the up coming 7.56.706 release. Instead, it is scheduled to be released in early August. See the following knowledge base article:
http://support.elliott.com/knowledgebase/articles/919872-feature-a-r-expanded-aging-report-add-show-op -
3 votescompleted ·AdminEdward M. Kwang - NETcellent System, Inc.
(CEO / Founder, NETcellent Systems, Inc.)
responded
This change is completed in Elliott V8 and will be in the next release.
-
Add ability to Open an Order in Order Entry from the Open Orders Inquiry Special Function Screen
When viewing orders in the Open Orders Inquiry window accessed by hitting Alt-O or clicking under the Special Functions button, it would be great to have the ability to right click on an order and open it directly in Order Entry. Right now, you have to find your Order Entry window and then key in the information to open it for editing.
3 votescompleted ·AdminEdward M. Kwang - NETcellent System, Inc.
(CEO / Founder, NETcellent Systems, Inc.)
responded
This feature had been implemented with Elliott V8.2.
-
Create Order Release Log File
In COP -> Processing -> Release Held Order, we often have issue on who release the order and what was the original reason why the order was put on hold in the first place. Can we have an audit trail for whenever an order is released? Ideally, this released order audit trail should contains, date time, order and customer information. Most importantly, it should contains the person who released it and what was the original credit hold reasons.
3 votescompleted ·AdminEdward M. Kwang - NETcellent System, Inc.
(CEO / Founder, NETcellent Systems, Inc.)
responded
This project is completed and will be in the next release. There’s a global setup flag to turn on this feature. See the following article for detail: http://support.elliott.com/knowledgebase/articles/833913-feature-order-release-log-file
-
Item Last Received Date to Include BOMP Production Activity
Currently, the item last received date only includes activity from PO Receiving. Can we include BOMP production activity as well?
For manufacturing item, we do not purchase so there will be no last received date based on the current logic.
3 votescompleted ·AdminEdward M. Kwang - NETcellent System, Inc.
(CEO / Founder, NETcellent Systems, Inc.)
responded
This change is done and will be in the next Elliott update.
-
I Suggest Adding Item Description 2 to ATP (Available to Promise) by Item Report If Space Is Available
Currently Item Description 2 is not on the ATP by Item Report. I suggest adding it to that report if space is available.
3 votescompleted ·AdminEdward M. Kwang - NETcellent System, Inc.
(CEO / Founder, NETcellent Systems, Inc.)
responded
This change is done and will probably be released in early July. See following knowledge base article for more details:
-
Support HTML Version of Shipment Acknowledgement Email
The current Shipment Acknowledgement Email is a text version. Since in Elliott 8.6, it already supports the HTML version of the order acknowledgement, it is suggested that we should also support the HTML version of Shipment Acknowledgement Email.
2 votescompleted ·AdminEdward M. Kwang - NETcellent System, Inc.
(CEO / Founder, NETcellent Systems, Inc.)
responded
This feature is released in Elliott 8.6.
-
Populate Order Freight Account Even if Freight Amount Is Zero
In Order Entry billing screen, if the freight amount is zero, then the order freight account is blank by default. In some situation, external application like Starship (a third pparty shipping manifest system) can write freight amount back to Elliott order header field. It has no logic to update the order freight account.
As a result, when you bring up order billing screen, you can see there's a freight amount, but there's no freight account associate with it which look odd. However, this is more an aesthetic issue because during COP Sales Journal for posting the invoice, system will see…
2 votescompleted ·AdminEdward M. Kwang - NETcellent System, Inc.
(CEO / Founder, NETcellent Systems, Inc.)
responded
This change is done and will be in the next Elliott release.
-
Give User Warning Message For Void Check with Multiple Checks
When user try to void check(s), in many case, user has typo error at check number range (Starting Check No / Ending Check No) where they have to restore data to correct.
Suggest to pop-up warning message if check range more than one check then system shows number of checks will be voided. User should confirm to answer "Yes". Default value it "No".
2 votes -
Print Order Acknowledgement Eliminate Address Information
When Printing Order Acknowledgement (Not Laser), user is prompted to enter Starting and Ending Order (OK), Starting and Ending Date (OK) and additional 4 lines of Correspondence and 1 line of Phone # that to my opinion are not necessary. I suggest to eliminate these lines or to add a global setup that will do it. I would leave the Order Type and consider to add "Print Duplicate?" question.
2 votescompleted ·AdminEdward M. Kwang - NETcellent System, Inc.
(CEO / Founder, NETcellent Systems, Inc.)
responded
See KB article for detail: http://support.elliott.com/knowledgebase/articles/1948072-feature-prompt-addr-phone-in-order-ack-and-ema
-
Stop Multiple Users From Running Sales Order Import at the same time
If multiple users run sales order import at the same time as another user or a scheduled deferred processing job they will often lock up one another or the deferred processing job will lock and need to be reset.
There should be a way to avoid the lockups.
Straight from the man himself:
I think there’s a few areas we can look into:
(1) We need to have a mechanism for the defer processing not to lock up and just skip the job with printing something like “Sales Order Import Skipped Due to CPIMPHDR work file is in used by…2 votescompleted ·AdminEdward M. Kwang - NETcellent System, Inc.
(CEO / Founder, NETcellent Systems, Inc.)
responded
The change for (1) was completed. The new logic is that if there are two users (including defer processing) trying to perform sales order import at the same time, the 2nd user will get proper message without file accessing error and thus stop the defer processing.
-
Stock status Inquiry - Default Location
Stock status Inquiry - Default Location
Since there is no current setting for setting the default location in stock
status inquiry would it be possible for it to remember the users last choice? This would prevent constant changing. This is important for
multi-bin setups.2 votescompleted ·AdminEdward M. Kwang - NETcellent System, Inc.
(CEO / Founder, NETcellent Systems, Inc.)
responded
See KB article for detail: http://support.elliott.com/knowledgebase/articles/1948048-feature-stock-status-inquiry-store-location-in-r
-
Removing Line Item With Restricted Attribute On It
We have never been able to remove a line item off of an order in Order Entry if there's a restricted attribute on that item. For instance, let's say there is an existing order and a restricted attribute has been added to a certain product line, etc. that prevents that customer from ordering it. The order will get thrown on hold at the time of a picking ticket. If we go into that order in Order Entry to delete it, it won't allow us into that line item. The only way to remove it is to take the restricted attribute…
2 votescompleted ·AdminEdward M. Kwang - NETcellent System, Inc.
(CEO / Founder, NETcellent Systems, Inc.)
responded
This change has been completed and will be available in the next Elliott release.
-
Create an Event to Print Duplicate Invoice
We have the event to Print invoice. There is no event to Print Duplicate Invoice which is a different program and the recommended method when using Post Office. I think we should have the Event for Print Duplicate Invoice as well.
2 votescompleted ·AdminEdward M. Kwang - NETcellent System, Inc.
(CEO / Founder, NETcellent Systems, Inc.)
responded
This change has been completed. It will available in the next Elliott general release.
-
Date of Last Manufacture listed on Costed Bill of Material Report
It would be helpful if the Costed Bill of Material Report for a manufactured, stocked item included the date last manufactured.
2 votescompleted ·AdminEdward M. Kwang - NETcellent System, Inc.
(CEO / Founder, NETcellent Systems, Inc.)
responded
This change was completed on 3/14/19 and will be available in the next Elliott general release after this date. See http://support.elliott.com/knowledgebase/articles/1904896-feature-added-csv-file-creation-to-print-costed for more information.
-
Order Import - add an option to move a GOOD file to a folder
When doing Order Import, Netcellent introduced new flags, 26 and 27 that handles the move of a file with errors to a different folder, this is a good feature. For good files. Elliott deletes the import file. My understanding from a conversation with Mark is that this logic of NOT archiving the import file is because of the assumption that the file already created in an EDI system and exists there. But if the import is NOT from EDI (maybe the partner created it in the required format), forcing the user to save it in 2 places is an extra…
2 votescompleted ·AdminEdward M. Kwang - NETcellent System, Inc.
(CEO / Founder, NETcellent Systems, Inc.)
responded
This feature is available in Elliott version 8.29.212. See http://support.elliott.com/knowledgebase/articles/1896151-feature-move-successful-order-import-files-to-se for more information.
-
Import To Remove An Attribute
Currently we have the ability to do a mass add or update via the Attribute Import, but I'm not aware of a way to mass remove an attribute from customers, items, etc. through Elliott. Is it possible to add that feature to the Attribute Import module?
2 votescompleted ·AdminEdward M. Kwang - NETcellent System, Inc.
(CEO / Founder, NETcellent Systems, Inc.)
responded
This change has been completed and will be available in the next Elliott release. See http://support.elliott.com/knowledgebase/articles/1894678-feature-allow-mass-delete-of-attribute-records for more information.
- Don't see your idea?