AdminEdward M. Kwang - NETcellent System, Inc. (Admin, NETcellent Systems, Inc.)

My feedback

  1. 1 vote
    Sign in
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Elliott Forum  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    We will evaluate this for Elliott V9

  2. 1 vote
    Sign in
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Elliott Forum  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    We will do this for Elliott V9

  3. 4 votes
    Sign in
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    under review  ·  2 comments  ·  Elliott Forum  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    When perform re-apply, system currently will assume to create a new record.
    If the new record key already exist, then we do not allow.
    We will evaluate to change so when the new record key already exist, we will perform a merge, instead of stopping it.

  4. 2 votes
    Sign in
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Elliott Forum  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    This should be doable with Elliott 8.3 which has the report writing capability

  5. 1 vote
    Sign in
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Elliott Forum  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  6. 2 votes
    Sign in
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Elliott Forum  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    We will be adding the Product Category and the Material Cost Type to the Item Audit Trail file in V9.0.

  7. 1 vote
    Sign in
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Elliott Forum  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    We have no plan to support item cost at the warehouse level. We suggest you to use a different item.

  8. 3 votes
    Sign in
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Elliott Forum  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  9. 3 votes
    Sign in
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Elliott Forum  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    We are not aware of the 2nd operator to replace the first operator scenario. We will do a test to check if that’s the case. In the mean time, we think it is a good idea to offer the 2nd operator the option to login the work center automatically when the 1st operator is already on that job. This way, the 2nd operator time become the share labor. When the 2nd operator leave that job by working on other job, the share labor time automatically stop. Is this something you image how it should work?

  10. 3 votes
    Sign in
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Elliott Forum  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  11. 3 votes
    Sign in
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  Elliott Forum  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    We are aware of this might happen. But we are not sure how frequent this issue happen or under exact what condition this will happen. At this moment, we are not aware of a better solution than the current method to delete the orphan user session from PSQL engine.

  12. 1 vote
    Sign in
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Elliott Forum  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  13. 1 vote
    Sign in
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Elliott Forum  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    We had reviewed this issue in depth and we can't address this issue in any reasonable manner. Any changes will cause bigger problem in other area. At this moment, we are not going to address this issue. Instead, we are asking you to consider a few things in your procedure: (1) We suggest you not to perform GL interfacing while the posting is taking place. A lot of our users use defer processing at night to perform posting. That would certainly address this issue; (2) When interfacing with G/L , please interface distribution in the past, not the current date; (3) The chances of the out of balance increase because the distribution file is not purged and cause the interface take forever to complete which increase the chances of conflict. Therefore, we recommend you to purge your old distribution records to speed up your interface.

  14. 2 votes
    Sign in
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Elliott Forum  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Expanding of the AP invoice number came up many times before. In our next major version, we plan to expand the AP invoice number from 8 digits to 12 digits. We do understand that there are certain vendors (especially, trucking companies) will send you invoices over 12 digits. On the other hand, if we expand the maximum invoice number field to something like 25 digits, then it will cause difficult with displaying it on the screen because there are only so much real estate space. The common strategy to deal with this type of long invoice number problem is to use AP Voucher Reference. Enter the long invoice number on AP Voucher Reference. Then you should also go to Global Setup -> Acct -> AP Global Control. Turn on the following flag: "1. Print Voucher Reference On A/P Check?"

  15. 10 votes
    Sign in
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    8 comments  ·  Elliott Forum  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    When we evaluate this project, one thing that concerns us is the security issue. We are concerned that once we implement AP ACH feature, if there's no proper check and balance built into the system, then embezzlement can take place. That's the reason why some of users only allow ACH in (AR ACH), not ACH out (AP ACH or AR ACH credit).

    We like to hear from you on how you think the proper security, check and balance, should be built into the system to prevent potential fraud.

  16. 1 vote
    Sign in
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Elliott Forum  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Dan, in the original modules design, IM (Inventory Management) is a lower layer module than PO (Purchase Order). That is, you could have IM module, without PO module. But not vice versa.

    Even though most of the user perform Landed Cost calculation through PO module, but user could perform do that base on the receiving transaction in IM Inventory Transaction Processing as well. Therefore, placing the report under the IM module making more sense than PO module. Just FYI

  17. 3 votes
    Sign in
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Elliott Forum  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Dan, I like your idea. This is probably something we should look at in Elliott V9.

  18. 1 vote
    Sign in
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Elliott Forum  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    There are two concerns with implementing this feature: (1) This particular feature is complicated. Especially the logic to ensure good performance now we are printing against the invoice history database; (2) The coding with DYO is difficult to maintain.

    We are considering moving away from DYO. We can't be sure if we are going to create something new to replace DYO in Elliott V9 or continue to support it. If you can implement your invoice form with standard Elliott form, we would encourage you to do so.

  19. 3 votes
    Sign in
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    planned  ·  0 comments  ·  Elliott Forum  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  20. 4 votes
    Sign in
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Elliott Forum  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

Feedback and Knowledge Base