AdminEdward M. Kwang - NETcellent System, Inc. (Admin, NETcellent Systems, Inc.)

My feedback

  1. 1 vote
    Sign in
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Expanding of the AP invoice number came up many times before. In our next major version, we plan to expand the AP invoice number from 8 digits to 12 digits. We do understand that there are certain vendors (especially, trucking companies) will send you invoices over 12 digits. On the other hand, if we expand the maximum invoice number field to something like 25 digits, then it will cause difficult with displaying it on the screen because there are only so much real estate space. The common strategy to deal with this type of long invoice number problem is to use AP Voucher Reference. Enter the long invoice number on AP Voucher Reference. Then you should also go to Global Setup -> Acct -> AP Global Control. Turn on the following flag: "1. Print Voucher Reference On A/P Check?"

  2. 3 votes
    Sign in
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  3. 10 votes
    Sign in
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    When we evaluate this project, one thing that concerns us is the security issue. We are concerned that once we implement AP ACH feature, if there's no proper check and balance built into the system, then embezzlement can take place. That's the reason why some of users only allow ACH in (AR ACH), not ACH out (AP ACH or AR ACH credit).

    We like to hear from you on how you think the proper security, check and balance, should be built into the system to prevent potential fraud.

  4. 1 vote
    Sign in
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Dan, in the original modules design, IM (Inventory Management) is a lower layer module than PO (Purchase Order). That is, you could have IM module, without PO module. But not vice versa.

    Even though most of the user perform Landed Cost calculation through PO module, but user could perform do that base on the receiving transaction in IM Inventory Transaction Processing as well. Therefore, placing the report under the IM module making more sense than PO module. Just FYI

  5. 3 votes
    Sign in
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Dan, I like your idea. This is probably something we should look at in Elliott V9.

  6. 1 vote
    Sign in
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    There are two concerns with implementing this feature: (1) This particular feature is complicated. Especially the logic to ensure good performance now we are printing against the invoice history database; (2) The coding with DYO is difficult to maintain.

    We are considering moving away from DYO. We can't be sure if we are going to create something new to replace DYO in Elliott V9 or continue to support it. If you can implement your invoice form with standard Elliott form, we would encourage you to do so.

  7. 3 votes
    Sign in
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    planned  ·  0 comments  ·  Elliott Forum  ·  Admin →
  8. 3 votes
    Sign in
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  9. 1 vote
    Sign in
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  10. 1 vote
    Sign in
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  11. 5 votes
    Sign in
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  12. 2 votes
    Sign in
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Did you try the function at PO -> Processing -> Purge Closed Purchase Order?

  13. 3 votes
    Sign in
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  14. 3 votes
    Sign in
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  15. 2 votes
    Sign in
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Can you be more specifically indicate which web services, method, and how you want the return structure be modified?

    Please be aware of that changes like this usually can't be achieved easily because if we modify the return structure, then we are breaking the contract between the code and web services. Therefore, instead of modifying the existing web services, we often introduce a new web services. That of course, make this process a lot more complicated than a simple change.

  16. 3 votes
    Sign in
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

← Previous 1 2 Next →

Feedback and Knowledge Base