Sheryl Manz - Davidson's, Inc.

My feedback

  1. 11 votes
    Sign in
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Sheryl Manz - Davidson's, Inc. commented  · 

    I would like to see accumulators in addition to PTD and YTD - Monthly and QTD accumulators for customers, slm, vendors, items, etc. I also think there could be some Elliott reports for these new accumulator fields.

    Sheryl Manz - Davidson's, Inc. commented  · 

    I suggest group permissions for attribute maintenance. Users in the same group need to have access to each others' attributes without having to setup a hierarchy for each person in the group.

    Sheryl Manz - Davidson's, Inc. commented  · 

    I noticed a lot of changes to attributes but I'm wondering if you could take it a step further.
    Currently, you can set an attribute for shareable for read, change & delete, but that applies the same permissions to everyone (except the owner). If I give a user permission to change other users' attributes, they have access to change or delete ANY attributes.
    I'd like to see better attribute permissions - possibly based on groups. For instance, people who have access to change item attributes don't need to be able to change customer attributes, and vice-versa.
    Thank you

  2. 2 votes
    Sign in
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Sheryl Manz - Davidson's, Inc. supported this idea  · 
  3. 4 votes
    Sign in
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Sheryl Manz - Davidson's, Inc. supported this idea  · 
  4. 4 votes
    Sign in
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    planned  ·  0 comments  ·  Elliott Forum  ·  Admin →
    Sheryl Manz - Davidson's, Inc. supported this idea  · 
  5. 10 votes
    Sign in
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Sheryl Manz - Davidson's, Inc. commented  · 

    We have fraud control on our account that requires us to upload a list of our checks every day. If a check is presented to the bank for payment but it's not on the list, it is put in a discrepancy queue and we receive a notification of the exception. We can go to the queue and manually approve it if necessary. (This could happen if we run a late check that missed the upload or our A/P person is out and the upload doesn't get done).
    Maybe the responsibility would fall on the company using this function along with their bank to set up proper controls - You would just provide the functionality.

    Sheryl Manz - Davidson's, Inc. supported this idea  · 
  6. 2 votes
    Sign in
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Sheryl Manz - Davidson's, Inc. supported this idea  · 
  7. 4 votes
    Sign in
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Sheryl Manz - Davidson's, Inc. supported this idea  · 
  8. 4 votes
    Sign in
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Sheryl Manz - Davidson's, Inc. shared this idea  · 
  9. 3 votes
    Sign in
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Sheryl Manz - Davidson's, Inc. supported this idea  · 
  10. 3 votes
    Sign in
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Sheryl Manz - Davidson's, Inc. supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base