143 results found

1. Check If Valid PO Number Entered for EDI Trading Partner

   If a customer has an EDI Partner profile setup, general speaking, they would (1) need a valid PO number; (2) need the PO number be less than 22 digits because that's standard EDI limit.

   For (1), we should setup a flag in EDI trading partner profile to indicate whether PO number is required or not. For (2), it is safe to assume that if the EDI trading partner profile is setup for the customer, then the PO length should not exceed 22 digits. Currently, Elliott allow 25 digits PO number.

   The implementation should apply to the following areas: (a) COP Order Entry; (b) COP Copy/Consolidate Order; (c) COP Sales Desk. We probably do not need to apply to Sales Order Import or web services because we can assume the original data should not have this issue.

   We can look at the existing coding and implement changes by following CHECK-DUP-PO paragraph.

   If a customer has an EDI Partner profile setup, general speaking, they would (1) need a valid PO number; (2) need the PO number be less than 22 digits because that's standard EDI limit.

   For (1), we should setup a flag in EDI trading partner profile to indicate whether PO number is required or not. For (2), it is safe to assume that if the EDI trading partner profile is setup for the customer, then the PO length should not exceed 22 digits. Currently, Elliott allow 25 digits PO number.

   The implementation should apply to the following areas: (a) COP… more

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   completed  ·  AdminEdward M. Kwang - NETcellent System, Inc. (CEO / Founder, NETcellent Systems, Inc.) responded

   This change has been completed and will be available in the next Elliott release. See http://support.elliott.com/knowledgebase/articles/1867936-feature-po-number-validation-for-edi-customers for more information.

2. F4 - Showing Purchase order Revision level on ATP drill down

   In the ATP inquiry section when drilling down to a purchase order it would
   be nice to see the F4 revision level (like under purchase order inquiry).
   Going further it would be nice that it would automatically go the the specific part number based on the part number you are working with to
   save time.

   0 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   completed  ·  AdminEdward M. Kwang - NETcellent System, Inc. (CEO / Founder, NETcellent Systems, Inc.) responded

   The F4=Revision option has been added to the drill down. This change will be available in the next Elliott release. See http://support.elliott.com/knowledgebase/articles/1860265-feature-added-f4-revision-option-to-po-inquiry for more information.

3. Allow Print One Invoice to Print Duplicate Invoices for Order Not Posted

   There is no elegant way to print a duplicate invoice for an order that is not yet posted. Printers sometimes have issues or some other printing errors can occur while printing an invoice. Bad toner, bad printout, etc... If the invoice does not physically print there are only 2 options to get the invoice printed that I know of.

   1. Print a duplicate invoice using Print Invoices. This can be done, but will also lock all users from printing invoices if the user does not complete the task quickly enough. This options is not good for users not skilled in Elliott enough to get it done quickly.

   2. Void the invoice and reprint it using Print One Invoice. This works, but unnecessarily burns invoice numbers just to get an invoice to print.

   If an order is not yet posted, allow the duplicate invoice to be printed in Print One Invoice if it meets all of the criteria to be printed.

   There is no elegant way to print a duplicate invoice for an order that is not yet posted. Printers sometimes have issues or some other printing errors can occur while printing an invoice. Bad toner, bad printout, etc... If the invoice does not physically print there are only 2 options to get the invoice printed that I know of.

   1. Print a duplicate invoice using Print Invoices. This can be done, but will also lock all users from printing invoices if the user does not complete the task quickly enough. This options is not good for users not skilled in Elliott… more

   3 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   3 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   completed  ·  AdminEdward M. Kwang - NETcellent System, Inc. (CEO / Founder, NETcellent Systems, Inc.) responded

   This change has been completed and will be available in Elliott version 8.5. See http://support.elliott.com/knowledgebase/articles/1905421-feature-allow-print-one-invoice-to-print-duplica for more information on this feature.

4. Add Wish List Access to Order Entry

   In the Order Entry Item Search menu, add the ability to access and maintain the customer's Wish List. You can then select an item in their Wish List and it enters it for you to begin entering the line item.

   •  

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   completed  ·  AdminEdward M. Kwang - NETcellent System, Inc. (CEO / Founder, NETcellent Systems, Inc.) responded

   This feature will be available in the next Elliott release. See http://support.elliott.com/knowledgebase/articles/1851265-feature-add-wish-list-access-to-order-entry-line for more information about this feature.

5. COP Pick Ticket - Default Line Item Promise date Cut Off Option

   When Printing a Pick Ticker Field 4 is defaulted to the current date. We all understand the reason for that. Some companies would like to default to 12/31/30 (similar to the Billing option), so ALL Pick tickets are printed. I suggest to add an option similar to the Global Setup, COP Function Order Billing Field 12 to the Global Setup, Pick/Pack Ticket/Ship Label screen.

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   1 comment  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   completed  ·  AdminEdward M. Kwang - NETcellent System, Inc. (CEO / Founder, NETcellent Systems, Inc.) responded

   This change is complete and will be available in the next Elliott release. See http://support.elliott.com/knowledgebase/articles/1888810-feature-new-default-options-for-line-item-reques for more information.

6. Option to Supress Total Weight When Print Packing List

   Currently, when print packing list, the total weight is always printed at the the bottom of the packing list like:
   TTL WEIGHT - 999,999.999
   It has been suggested by some users that the total weight in Elliott is not necessary correct due to various reasons. Therefore, it would be desirable if the packing list does not print total weight. We could potentially introduce a global setup flag for this purpose. If we should make this change, this flag should apply to both regular packing list, as well as packing list by box.

   Please let us know how do you feel about this change.

   Currently, when print packing list, the total weight is always printed at the the bottom of the packing list like:
   TTL WEIGHT - 999,999.999
   It has been suggested by some users that the total weight in Elliott is not necessary correct due to various reasons. Therefore, it would be desirable if the packing list does not print total weight. We could potentially introduce a global setup flag for this purpose. If we should make this change, this flag should apply to both regular packing list, as well as packing list by box.

   Please let us know how do you feel… more

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   completed  ·  AdminEdward M. Kwang - NETcellent System, Inc. (CEO / Founder, NETcellent Systems, Inc.) responded

   This change is complete and will be available in the next Elliott release. See http://support.elliott.com/knowledgebase/articles/1860289-feature-added-global-setup-field-print-total-we for more information.

7. Support Phantom Locking with Item and Customer Change

   Currently, most of the locking conflicts in Elliott come from user going to item or customer file maintenance change mode. User keep the change record on the screen without releasing it. This can happen when the user is interrupt with a phone call, or has to take a break. This however, causing extensive locking for other users who need to update the item or customer record and wait have to wait in the locking loop until this record is released.

   It is suggested that we should consider implementing phantom locking on Item and Customer in the change mode to avoid locking conflict. Just as an example, the phantom locking for item table work as following:
   (1) User bring up item A in item file maintenance change mode. Traditionally, the item A will be locked at this moment. With phantom locking, there's no lock on item A. However, we will keep a copy of the record A as the original value.
   (2) User 1 change the item A and save it. However, before saving it, system will read item A with lock, then compare if the record is different with the original value.
   (3) If the record value is the same, then system will proceed with the change and save the record, and release the lock.
   (4) If the record value is not the same, then system will warn user that the record had been changed by someone else while trying to change the record and retry it again, and release the lock without making changes.
   (5) Since the time it takes from (2) to (3) or (4) is only a split of a second (because there's no users interface), the locking burden is minimal which will greatly reduce the potential locking conflict.

   In theory, all master file maintenance can create a locking conflict stated above. But, base on our experience, so far the areas that more likely to cause the conflict is customer and item file maintenance. Therefore, we suggest to address these two areas first. Let us know if you are interested for us to support something like this.

   Currently, most of the locking conflicts in Elliott come from user going to item or customer file maintenance change mode. User keep the change record on the screen without releasing it. This can happen when the user is interrupt with a phone call, or has to take a break. This however, causing extensive locking for other users who need to update the item or customer record and wait have to wait in the locking loop until this record is released.

   It is suggested that we should consider implementing phantom locking on Item and Customer in the change mode to avoid… more

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   completed  ·  AdminEdward M. Kwang - NETcellent System, Inc. (CEO / Founder, NETcellent Systems, Inc.) responded

   This change has been completed. It is available in Elliott version 7.58.608 and 8.28.608.

8. Material Production History Report - Totals

   When printing the Material Production History Report it does
   not provide totals for Order QTY or Rptd. Qty. It would be nice
   to have this feature.

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   completed  ·  AdminEdward M. Kwang - NETcellent System, Inc. (CEO / Founder, NETcellent Systems, Inc.) responded

   This change is complete.

9. Allow Deferred Processing for Post Office

   Scheduling Post Office activities will be an excellent tool. For example, running the Printing Order Acknowledgement with Post Office every hour automatically using the Deferred Processing. Now it has to be done manually. When having intensive order entry operation, printing / emailing an immediate order acknowledgement slows down the operation and this has to be done in batch mode.

   3 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   2 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   completed  ·  AdminEdward M. Kwang - NETcellent System, Inc. (CEO / Founder, NETcellent Systems, Inc.) responded

   This feature is implemented in Elliott 8.6.

10. PSQL v13 - (now called Zen Embedded ) is this supported for Elliott v8.2?

    Looking to see if the new version of PSQL v13 is supported.
    Let us know.

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    completed  ·  AdminEdward M. Kwang - NETcellent System, Inc. (CEO / Founder, NETcellent Systems, Inc.) responded

    We formally support PSQL 13 starting 7/1/2018

11. Vendor AP Account

    Similar to field 25 on the Customer File maintenance, it will be nice to have an A/P General ledger account. Then in field 15 on the transaction file, default to the Vendor A/P Account. Similarly, field 11 on the PO Invoice screen will default to the Vendor A/P account as well.

    3 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    completed  ·  AdminEdward M. Kwang - NETcellent System, Inc. (CEO / Founder, NETcellent Systems, Inc.) responded

    We had changed the V9 database structure of APVENFIL to support this.

12. COP Edit list

    COP Edit list - Cans anything been done to export the other 2 salesman & percentage to the csv file? It would make Sorting / using pivot tables easier.

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    completed  ·  0 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →

13. Add Ability To Create ASN Label Files from Order Inquiry -> Shipping Information Window

    Add the functionality to generate ASN label files from the Order Inquiry -> Shipment Information window for orders and invoices. These files can then be used by Bartender to print ASN labels.

    2 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    completed  ·  1 comment  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →

14. Purge Utility for SYACTLOG (System Activity Log) Table

    SYACTLOG (System Activity Log) table contains the following kind of data:
    * Elliott Users Login
    * Web (Web Services) eContact Login
    * Email Activities
    * Credit Card Charges
    * Print Activities
    * Other activities
    This table tend to become very big and make it difficult to retrieve data. Currently, system does not have a purge utility for this table. It is suggested that we should provide a utility to allow users to purge this table for certain type of activities with cut-off date.

    2 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    completed  ·  AdminEdward M. Kwang - NETcellent System, Inc. (CEO / Founder, NETcellent Systems, Inc.) responded

    This feature is available in Elliott V7.58.912/V8,28,912. See http://support.elliott.com/knowledgebase/articles/1876561-feature-added-the-ability-to-purge-the-system-ac for more information.

15. Email Locking Event to Offending User

    Currently, Elliott allow subscribing a management event by going to Global Setup, Press Detail Event button, and F5 key to insert the LCKEVENT - Record Lock Triggered Per Min. When a record lock over one minute is taking place, this event email can be sent to a specific person, like the admin of the organization.

    It is suggested that this email should be sent to the offending user (the user who create the locking condition in the first place). The issue we had was that we know the offending user Windows login, but we do not know the Elliott corresponding user login. With Elliott V8, this dynamic is changed. In Elliott V8, we do track the Windows login ID. See attached screen.

    So what we propose is to allow user to right click on Event Email tab, at the To, cc and bcc columns, allow the ability to add "Email by Windows User ID" and "Email by Elliott User ID". so the right click list will not be expanded like following:
    System Variables ->
    Owner E-mail
    Triggered y E-mail
    Primary eContact
    Non-Blocked Primary eContact
    *Email by Window User ID
    *Email by Elliott User ID
    Note the last two are proposed newly added option. If you choose one of them, then we ask the variables that contain the User ID. The system does not have intelligent to know which variables would contains the Windows or Elliott User ID, it is depending on the user to make the right decision. If you use this feature on an event does not provide Windows or Elliott User ID, then there's no way to make this work.

    The return variable to the To, CC and BCC fields will look like:
    @@WIN-USER-EM(REF-ID02)(@@
    @@ELI-USER-EM(REF-ID03)@@
    It is user's responsibility to identify which REF-ID contains the Windows User ID or Elliott User ID.

    It is possible that this variable can not produce a valid email address. This can happen because:
    (1) The offending user is on Elliott V7.x which we don't track the login Window user ID.
    (2) The email address is not defined in password setup.
    (3) The Windows or Elliott User ID is not found in the user list for some reason.
    (4) The defined email address is not a valid email address.

    In that case, system will not be able to return an email address back to this variable. If there are no email address for the event because of this, then this event email is simply not sent.

    This feature will only work for V8 users.

    Currently, Elliott allow subscribing a management event by going to Global Setup, Press Detail Event button, and F5 key to insert the LCKEVENT - Record Lock Triggered Per Min. When a record lock over one minute is taking place, this event email can be sent to a specific person, like the admin of the organization.

    It is suggested that this email should be sent to the offending user (the user who create the locking condition in the first place). The issue we had was that we know the offending user Windows login, but we do not know the Elliott corresponding… more

    •  

    4 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    completed  ·  AdminEdward M. Kwang - NETcellent System, Inc. (CEO / Founder, NETcellent Systems, Inc.) responded

    Project completed and available in the current Elliott release. See KB article: https://support.elliott.com/knowledgebase/articles/2001814-feature-send-an-email-to-the-user-locking-a-recor

16. Pick ticket to print in bin sequence from work order entry screen

    It would be helpful after a work order is created and it asks if you want to print the pick ticket, that there would either be a global setup or option to print out in bin sequence. This would eliminate having to go to another screen in order to do so.

    •  

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    completed  ·  AdminEdward M. Kwang - NETcellent System, Inc. (CEO / Founder, NETcellent Systems, Inc.) responded

    This project is complete and will be available in the next Elliott release. Review this knowledge base article for more information on how the application has been changed. http://support.elliott.com/knowledgebase/articles/1831915-feature-add-default-for-material-pick-list-pri

17. Password Control on Update Parent Cost in Inventory? in Print Costed Bill Of Material

    When running Print Costed Bill of Material we might want the abiliity to allow only specific users to answer Y in Field 15, Update Parent Cost in Inventory? I thing that Global and User Password control is necessary here.

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    completed  ·  AdminEdward M. Kwang - NETcellent System, Inc. (CEO / Founder, NETcellent Systems, Inc.) responded

    This change has been implemented in v7.5/8.x by adding a new option to the Global Setup flag. Users have the option to allow access to the field with a password. This change will be available in the next Elliott release. See the following knowledge base article for more information: http://support.elliott.com/knowledgebase/articles/1831918-feature-allow-password-to-be-required-to-update

18. Change the logging of Mass Email to be by user and date

    Right now, if multiple users are sending mass emails at the same time Elliott will try to record everything in the log file. Since there are multiple users sending emails at the same time, the log file will get locked and a new one will be create. This happens over and over resulting in many, many log files.

    If the log files were recorded by USER and Date there would be no concurrency issue. Each user would write to their own log file and there would be far less log files created in a day.

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    completed  ·  0 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →

19. Allow CSV Export for Physical Inventory Count Reports

    Allow export of Physical Inventory Count Reports so that you could easily use the report for recounts.

    3 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    completed  ·  AdminEdward M. Kwang - NETcellent System, Inc. (CEO / Founder, NETcellent Systems, Inc.) responded

    CSV Support has been added to the single and multi-bin versions of the Update Edit List and the Variance Report By Item/Warehouse. The CSV file does not include serial number information but includes any comments if there is a serial number mismatch that will prevent a tag from posting. This change will be available in the next Elliott release. See http://support.elliott.com/knowledgebase/articles/1865605-feature-added-csv-support-to-the-physical-count for more information.

20. Put An Order On Hold Or Choose Third Party Billing From Sales Desk Screen

    Currently we don't have the ability to place an order on hold or to select third party billing when writing up a new order through sales desk. We have to go back into an order entry screen to put in the H for hold, T for third party billing, etc. Having the ability to do that when closing out an order in sales desk would be very helpful.

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    completed  ·  AdminEdward M. Kwang - NETcellent System, Inc. (CEO / Founder, NETcellent Systems, Inc.) responded

    This change is complete and will be available in the next Elliott release. See http://support.elliott.com/knowledgebase/articles/1850833-feature-allow-entry-of-freight-pay-code-order-st for more information about this feature.