AdminEdward M. Kwang - NETcellent System, Inc.
(CEO / Founder, NETcellent Systems, Inc.)
My feedback
61 results found
-
3 votesAdminEdward M. Kwang - NETcellent System, Inc.
(CEO / Founder, NETcellent Systems, Inc.)
supported this idea
·
-
2 votesplanned ·AdminEdward M. Kwang - NETcellent System, Inc.
(CEO / Founder, NETcellent Systems, Inc.)
responded
This feature is planned in Elliott 8.6.
AdminEdward M. Kwang - NETcellent System, Inc.
(CEO / Founder, NETcellent Systems, Inc.)
supported this idea
·
-
3 votesAdminEdward M. Kwang - NETcellent System, Inc.
(CEO / Founder, NETcellent Systems, Inc.)
supported this idea
·
-
2 votesAdminEdward M. Kwang - NETcellent System, Inc.
(CEO / Founder, NETcellent Systems, Inc.)
supported this idea
·
-
1 vote
-
2 votes
-
2 votes
-
2 votes
-
2 votes
-
1 vote
-
1 vote
-
2 votesAdminEdward M. Kwang - NETcellent System, Inc.
(CEO / Founder, NETcellent Systems, Inc.)
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment -
2 votes
-
2 votes
-
2 votes
-
1 vote
-
2 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Are you refer to non-stock items only? What about the phantom items and their blow through? Are you concern about that as well? We are thinking maybe we can introduce a global setup flag to determine this behavior. Please reply and let us know more details. If you can provide some concrete sample, that will help too.
-
1 vote
An error occurred while saving the comment We need to handle this on the report by report basis. So this is not a generic defer processing feature. Please provide the reports that you would run for month end, so we can evaluate if we can make those report defer processing month end friendly.
-
3 votes
-
4 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment It will be difficult to support adding "Productive" operation once the production is started. We can have calculation integrity issue. But adding a "Setup" type of operation is doable. So rework can be done through adding new "setup" operation in between two operations.
An error occurred while saving the comment We could always void the printed work order, and allocated it, then go back to change the work order. Once change the plus work order, re-print it.
AdminEdward M. Kwang - NETcellent System, Inc.
(CEO / Founder, NETcellent Systems, Inc.)
supported this idea
·
A possible solution is to add a new column "K. PO Number" and create an alternative to provide "A. Customer No" + "K. PO Number" as valid combination. But if the Customer + PO number is not unique, system will detect that and give error. Then it is up to the user to add additional information like invoice or order number to those duplicate rows to make it unique.