Skip to content

Elliott Forum

126 results found

  1. Use F2=Labor Only When Report Zero Qty in Plus Work Order Time Clock Reporting

    In Plus Work Order, Work Order Production Reporting for the time clock operation, user can choose "Qty Completed" = 0. This will stop the time clock for that either that operation, or previous operation (depend on what operation was previously working on). If user choose to report Qty Completed = 0, then there is no Production Transaction created. As a result, the WIP and accounting side will not be updated. If user wish to create production transaction to so WIP is created, user can Press F2 key which means to report "Labor Only".

    It is suggested that some users would…

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  2. Give User Warning Message for Plus Work Order When Reporting Last Operation with Shortage

    There's a great feature for tracking material shortage with Elliott Plus Work Order. See the KB article at: http://support.elliott.com/knowledgebase/articles/1185577-feature-create-material-shortage-tracking-with-p

    However, sometime even though the shortage materials already received and are used in production, but user may not pay attention and report the materials for the work order and reporting quantity completion with the last operation. This cause the cost calculation incorrectly and may inventory adjustment need to take place later.

    It is proposed that we add the following flags to BOMP Global Control:
    * Give User Warning When Report Last Operation with Shortage?
    Default is "N". If user set to…

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  3. When splitting a Lot line in COP, insert the new line instead of adding a line at the end

    When doing Billing or Shipping Confirmation, on a Lot line and the selected lot doesn't have enough quantity, Elliott creates a new line after all the existing lines. This makes the lots' selection very cumbersome as the user has to "jump" between the items according to the sequence of the lines. If user can Insert a new line (this can be a Global setup questions), all the lines for a specific item will be grouped together, which will make the lot selection by item easier.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  4. In Vendor Inquiry Summary drill down to the Cash Account used to pay the voucher

    Currently Elliott has a F2 function to show multiple checks that paid a voucher. But user cannot see the cash account used. This is critical if there are multiple cash accounts or if multiple "deposit" accounts are used for pre-paid. I suggest to display the cash account near the check and use the F2 function to show the bank account in case of one check (as the screen has no room).

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  5. Add Support for Multiple SMTP Servers

    Right now, you can specify 1 SMTP server on the company level and 1 SMTP server on the user level. A user can be assigned to send emails though either, but not both.

    I propose adding the ability to specify multiple SMTP servers on the company level.

    Then, the ability should be added when creating EVENTS to allow the selection of one of the multiple SMTP servers if an email event is being created.

    You should also be able to choose while SMTP server Mass Email would use, while still maintaining the override on the user level.

    This would allow…

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  6. Recalculate Total Commission on order Header (Billing Screen) when line commission is changed to zero,

    Currently if COP Order line commission is changed to zero in CHANGE mode and the 3rd Billing screen was accessed before, the zero commission of the line is NOT part of the recalculated commission of the Header that is shown on the Billing screen. I discussed with Edward as i considered it as a bug, but Edward said that in some situations, users prefer this behavior.

    My idea is to add a flag that if user prefers that total commission will be recalculated and included zero commission lines, it will be done. I consider that as the "normal" behavior.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  7. Add Web Service for Links

    Add a web service to maintain the links in Elliott. At the least, the ability to create links on items, customers, etc...

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  8. Always Use Last Cost as PO's Default FOB Cost

    Currently, Elliott decide PO's Default FOB Cost base on the following priority sequence:
    (1) If Vendor Item record exist and set to use "Price Table", then Price Table will be used;
    (2) If PO Setup "20. Default FOB Std Cost On PO's" is set to "Y", then default to Item Std Cost;
    (3) If Vendor Item Record Exist, use the Vendor Item Last Purchase Cost;
    (4) Use Item's Last Cost.

    It had been suggested that we should modify the flag "20. Default FOB Std Cost On PO's ?" to "20. Default PO FOB Cost Method ?" and the possible value…

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  9. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  10. A Note Type to Put Literal Into The Body of Note As Part of the Note Body Text

    Currently, user is allowed to defined a note type with literal. In the example provided below, we have a note type "S" with literal. When we create a note with note type S, the literal is really not part of the note even though the literal is displayed. What I really like is the ability to define a note type with literal with the option "28. Put Literal in Note Body" The default is "N". But if user set this flag as "Y", then when a note is created, the literal is part of the note body. The main benefit…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  11. Order Entry SuperKit processing - allow changes to Cost

    Order Entry SuperKit processing - allow changes to Cost

    In OE Line Item Entry, when processing a SuperKit, expose COPORDOPTUNIT_COST and allow user option to change.

    • See attached for other SuperKit enhancement ideas.
    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  12. Support Location, Product Category and Customer Type to Determine Sales and COGS

    Currently, Elliott allow defining sales and COGS account by location and product category. We are facing with the following complaints:
    (1) User only want to define sales account by product category, not by location. Because of the fix structure, user will have to define all combination of locations and product categories which is a burden.
    (2) Sometime user may miss a combination, as a result the sales and COGS go to the default account causing reconciliation problem. System should make it easier to find potential missing setup problem.
    (3) Some users want to define sales and COGS account by customer…

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  13. Defer processing - Using it with system period control and system Date

    Being able to select Starting and Ending date in deferred processing would be a nice tool to have as it is
    Pre-defined. The accounting department runs the same reports every month and only the starting and ending
    Dates change. Does or can this feature be added easily? Also the option of running a report using the system date in
    Deferred processing would be helpful.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  14. Show non-inventory items on picking list by bills

    When printing a picking list by bill it does not show non-inventory tracked items. I need the non-inventory items that are a part of produc t structures to show up on picking list by bills.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  15. Total for number of orders by item,Product category,customer, ship-to on summary, brief and detail COP reports

    When running the COP open orders report it would be nice in the sub total area to know how many orders by item,Product category,customer, ship-to on summary, brief and detail COP reports.

    Currently QTY, B/O Qty, Value are all being totaled except the number of orders. It appears there would be space to allow for this in the standard reports.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  16. Looking for the ability to change promise date on PO after Print and have Delivery Performance Report acknowledge the updated date

    We constantly need to change internal priorities for deliveries after the PO has been issued to the vendor. We change the promise date to reflect this. Unfortunately the Delivery Performance Report isn't able to account for this. It still reads the original date. The vendor shouldn't be held accountable for our internal change of priority. It makes this report unusable for us. Can there be an option for the delivery report to read the adjusted promise date and not the original?

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  17. Allow Vendor Account Inquiry in PO# order

    Our Vendor POs often have multiple line items delivered over two or three months. A display in PO number order would assist in checking the current status of that POs invoice/payment history.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  18. Add Support for POCOMFIL to Export Processor

    When entering a purchase order and adding F2 comments on the line item screen, the comments are stored in the POCOMFIL table. Currently the Export Processor does not support exporting the information from this file.

    We propose adding support for this file.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  19. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  20. Resolve Cost Adjustment Issues Across Multiple Asset Accounts

    Resolve Cost Adjustment Issues Across Multiple Asset Accounts

    Currently, if you post a Cost Adjustment to an item that has QOH in multiple locations, with a different assigned GL Asset Account per location (via material cost type/location account control), the system defaults to writing the entire adjustment (qty summed across all locations) to the asset account indicated by the transaction location. If posted, this creates immediate discrepancy between effected GL Asset Account balances and the Stock Status by GL Report. Would like to see the system pre-fill distributions to accommodate this scenario, allowing user to choose final distribution account(s) to…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  • Don't see your idea?

Elliott Forum

Categories

Feedback and Knowledge Base