122 results found

1. Add Support for Multiple SMTP Servers

   Right now, you can specify 1 SMTP server on the company level and 1 SMTP server on the user level. A user can be assigned to send emails though either, but not both.

   I propose adding the ability to specify multiple SMTP servers on the company level.

   Then, the ability should be added when creating EVENTS to allow the selection of one of the multiple SMTP servers if an email event is being created.

   You should also be able to choose while SMTP server Mass Email would use, while still maintaining the override on the user level.

   This would allow different events and processes to use different SMTP servers.
   
   Customer facing emails could be sent through one service and internal only emails could be sent through another.

   Right now, you can specify 1 SMTP server on the company level and 1 SMTP server on the user level. A user can be assigned to send emails though either, but not both.

   I propose adding the ability to specify multiple SMTP servers on the company level.

   Then, the ability should be added when creating EVENTS to allow the selection of one of the multiple SMTP servers if an email event is being created.

   You should also be able to choose while SMTP server Mass Email would use, while still maintaining the override on the user level.

   This would allow… more

   2 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

2. Recalculate Total Commission on order Header (Billing Screen) when line commission is changed to zero,

   Currently if COP Order line commission is changed to zero in CHANGE mode and the 3rd Billing screen was accessed before, the zero commission of the line is NOT part of the recalculated commission of the Header that is shown on the Billing screen. I discussed with Edward as i considered it as a bug, but Edward said that in some situations, users prefer this behavior.
   
   My idea is to add a flag that if user prefers that total commission will be recalculated and included zero commission lines, it will be done. I consider that as the "normal" behavior.

   • 

   2 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

3. Add Web Service for Links

   Add a web service to maintain the links in Elliott. At the least, the ability to create links on items, customers, etc...

   2 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

4. Always Use Last Cost as PO's Default FOB Cost

   Currently, Elliott decide PO's Default FOB Cost base on the following priority sequence:
   (1) If Vendor Item record exist and set to use "Price Table", then Price Table will be used;
   (2) If PO Setup "20. Default FOB Std Cost On PO's" is set to "Y", then default to Item Std Cost;
   (3) If Vendor Item Record Exist, use the Vendor Item Last Purchase Cost;
   (4) Use Item's Last Cost.

   It had been suggested that we should modify the flag "20. Default FOB Std Cost On PO's ?" to "20. Default PO FOB Cost Method ?" and the possible value can be:
   Y=Std Cost; L=Last Cost; N=Vendor Item Last PO Cost before Last Cost

   Y or N value follow the priority sequence (1) - (4) above. If user choose "L", then it will affect the priority sequence for (2) - (4).

   In addition, we should change the logic that we use to update item vendor last cost field. Currently, the logic is update it when a PO is added, or the line item is added. But we don't update it if the PO or line item changed. This is to prevent an PO changed, canceled from updating the item vendor last cost field. But it some case, we could update the PO line item expected cost and like new cost be reflected in PO item vendor file. So it is suggested that we should add a new field ITEM-VEND-LAST-COST-FROM-PO which is an 8 bytes field to store the PO# that cause the update of ITEM-VEND-LAST-PUR-COST. Then during PO printing for change PO (& line items), we will compare the vendor item file ITEM-VEND-LAST-COST-FROM-PO if match with the current printing PO. If yes, then proceed with the update if ITEM-VEND-LAST-PUR-COST, otherwise skip it.

   Currently, Elliott decide PO's Default FOB Cost base on the following priority sequence:
   (1) If Vendor Item record exist and set to use "Price Table", then Price Table will be used;
   (2) If PO Setup "20. Default FOB Std Cost On PO's" is set to "Y", then default to Item Std Cost;
   (3) If Vendor Item Record Exist, use the Vendor Item Last Purchase Cost;
   (4) Use Item's Last Cost.

   It had been suggested that we should modify the flag "20. Default FOB Std Cost On PO's ?" to "20. Default PO FOB Cost Method ?" and the possible value… more

   •  

   2 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

5. Showing the Avg Days in Item Search in Stock status inquiry menu

   • 

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

6. A Note Type to Put Literal Into The Body of Note As Part of the Note Body Text

   Currently, user is allowed to defined a note type with literal. In the example provided below, we have a note type "S" with literal. When we create a note with note type S, the literal is really not part of the note even though the literal is displayed. What I really like is the ability to define a note type with literal with the option "28. Put Literal in Note Body" The default is "N". But if user set this flag as "Y", then when a note is created, the literal is part of the note body. The main benefit of doing it this way is that (1) We can then use free flow text in note which support copy and paste. In many case, I need to copy an email content to the note for documentation purpose so other people can see it too; (2) The printing of note will not skip note because a line with literal is blank.

   Currently, user is allowed to defined a note type with literal. In the example provided below, we have a note type "S" with literal. When we create a note with note type S, the literal is really not part of the note even though the literal is displayed. What I really like is the ability to define a note type with literal with the option "28. Put Literal in Note Body" The default is "N". But if user set this flag as "Y", then when a note is created, the literal is part of the note body. The main benefit… more

   •  

   •  

   •  

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

7. Order Entry SuperKit processing - allow changes to Cost

   Order Entry SuperKit processing - allow changes to Cost

   In OE Line Item Entry, when processing a SuperKit, expose COPORDOPTUNIT_COST and allow user option to change.

   • See attached for other SuperKit enhancement ideas.

   • 

   2 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close
   under review  ·  AdminEdward M. Kwang - NETcellent System, Inc. (CEO / Founder, NETcellent Systems, Inc.) responded

   Please look into the direction of using BOMP work order instead of kit item. You may customize BOMP work order components in COP as well.

8. Support Location, Product Category and Customer Type to Determine Sales and COGS

   Currently, Elliott allow defining sales and COGS account by location and product category. We are facing with the following complaints:
   (1) User only want to define sales account by product category, not by location. Because of the fix structure, user will have to define all combination of locations and product categories which is a burden.
   (2) Sometime user may miss a combination, as a result the sales and COGS go to the default account causing reconciliation problem. System should make it easier to find potential missing setup problem.
   (3) Some users want to define sales and COGS account by customer (customer type) instead of product category.

   Therefore, we are proposing the following changes in Elliott V9 to make it easier and flexible for the user to define sales & COGS account in Elliott. Our thinking is we can come up with a replacement for Product Category/Location account file (CPPRDACT.) The new file CPSLSCOG will support all combinations of the following 3 variables:
   Location
   Product Category
   Customer Type
   We will have the following combinations:
   1 = Location/Product Category/Customer Type
   2 = Location/Product Category
   3 = Location/Customer Type
   4 = Product Category/Customer Type
   5 = Location
   6 = Product Category
   7 = Customer Type
   In the Global Setup, we will ask the default combination code to determine Sales and Cost of Good Sold. If it is not setup, it is considered “2 = Location / Product Category” which is like the current feature. We will need to handle the conversion from 7-8 database to 9.0 accordingly. The new database CPSLSCOG (COP Sales & Cost of Good Account File) will replace CPPRDACT file and will have the following fields as primary key:
   Product Category Primary Key
   Location Primary Key
   Customer Type Primary key
   User can only choose one code in global setup. For example, if user choose “7 = Customer Type”. Then the data entry for “Sales & Cost of Goods Account File” will only prompt for “Customer Type”. The value for Location and Product Category will always be blank.

   User is allowed to change their sales and cost of goods account combination code from one to the other. For example, if they wish to change from code 7 to code 3. Then when they go to the user interface, system will prompt for Location and Customer Type. But system is not going to delete the old code 7 record automatically just in case user may want to change it back, or maybe still want to reference the old setup. The old codes is now become invalid, but will not cause problem staying in the database.

   The printing of the edit list will allow the following parameters:
   1. Starting Location
   2. Ending Location
   3. Starting Product Category
   4. Ending Product Category
   5. Starting Customer Type
   6. Ending Customer Type
   7. Print Invalid Setup Codes? (Default “N”)
   8. Print Missing Sales & COG Setup? (Default “N”)
   We allow “7. Print Invalid Setup Codes?” so users can print out the old setup for reference. At this moment, we are not providing an utility to purge them since purging is not necessary since they are harmless. If user really want to purge, we can purge for them in PSQL control center.

   We allow “8. Print Missing Sales & COG Setup?” because it is often user forget to add the corresponding Sales & COGS setup when a new customer type, location or product category is added. This may be intentionally so system will default it, or a mistake of oversight. We give this flag 8 so user can verify if they have any combination of setup that they may miss. For example, if user choose “7 = Customer Type” in global setup, then we will loop through the customer type file and find out if any customer type have a corresponding record in CPSLSCOG file. If user choose “3 = Location/Customer Type”, then we look through every combination of location and customer type to see if the corresponding record is missing. We will print the missing records like a regular record, but in the sales and cogs area show “*** Missing ***”. We will finalize the layout before implementing.

   Also, we should print in the grand total areas:
   999,999 Records Printed
   999,999 Invalid Records Printed (if flag 7 is setup to “Y” and invalid account codes > 0)
   999,999 Records Missing Setup (if flag 8 is set to “Y” and records missing setup > 0)

   We will also add a Global (Management) Event that support the following variables:
   Record Number (Value always = 1)
   Default Sales Account (From ARCTLFIL)
   Default COGS Account (From CPCTLFIL)
   All Locations Chosen Base on screen parameters and have value “Y”, “N” or blank if not applicable per global setup
   All Category Chosen Base on screen parameters and have value “Y”, “N” or blank if not applicable per global setup
   All Customer Type Chosen Base on screen parameters and have value “Y”, “N” or blank if not applicable per global setup
   Total Records Printed
   
   Total Invalid Records Printed If flag 7 is set to “Y”, otherwise 0
   Total Records Missing Setup If flag 8 is set to “Y”, otherwise 0
   The purpose is so that admin can subscribe to this event by filtering when “Total Records Missing Setup” > 0. Then admin can use defer processing to run this on the daily basis. If user miss the setup, then an email will be sent to warn the admin.

   We will also modify CP0305.CBL to reflect the new logic.

   Currently, Elliott allow defining sales and COGS account by location and product category. We are facing with the following complaints:
   (1) User only want to define sales account by product category, not by location. Because of the fix structure, user will have to define all combination of locations and product categories which is a burden.
   (2) Sometime user may miss a combination, as a result the sales and COGS go to the default account causing reconciliation problem. System should make it easier to find potential missing setup problem.
   (3) Some users want to define sales and COGS account by customer… more

   3 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   1 comment  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

9. Defer processing - Using it with system period control and system Date

   Being able to select Starting and Ending date in deferred processing would be a nice tool to have as it is
   Pre-defined. The accounting department runs the same reports every month and only the starting and ending
   Dates change. Does or can this feature be added easily? Also the option of running a report using the system date in
   Deferred processing would be helpful.

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   1 comment  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

10. Show non-inventory items on picking list by bills

    When printing a picking list by bill it does not show non-inventory tracked items. I need the non-inventory items that are a part of produc t structures to show up on picking list by bills.

    2 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

11. Total for number of orders by item,Product category,customer, ship-to on summary, brief and detail COP reports

    When running the COP open orders report it would be nice in the sub total area to know how many orders by item,Product category,customer, ship-to on summary, brief and detail COP reports.
    
    Currently QTY, B/O Qty, Value are all being totaled except the number of orders. It appears there would be space to allow for this in the standard reports.

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

12. Looking for the ability to change promise date on PO after Print and have Delivery Performance Report acknowledge the updated date

    We constantly need to change internal priorities for deliveries after the PO has been issued to the vendor. We change the promise date to reflect this. Unfortunately the Delivery Performance Report isn't able to account for this. It still reads the original date. The vendor shouldn't be held accountable for our internal change of priority. It makes this report unusable for us. Can there be an option for the delivery report to read the adjusted promise date and not the original?

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

13. Allow Vendor Account Inquiry in PO# order

    Our Vendor POs often have multiple line items delivered over two or three months. A display in PO number order would assist in checking the current status of that POs invoice/payment history.

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

14. Add Support for POCOMFIL to Export Processor

    When entering a purchase order and adding F2 comments on the line item screen, the comments are stored in the POCOMFIL table. Currently the Export Processor does not support exporting the information from this file.

    We propose adding support for this file.

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

15. ATP Process Criteria menu improvement

    ATP Process Criteria menu improvement

    • 

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

16. Resolve Cost Adjustment Issues Across Multiple Asset Accounts

    Resolve Cost Adjustment Issues Across Multiple Asset Accounts

    Currently, if you post a Cost Adjustment to an item that has QOH in multiple locations, with a different assigned GL Asset Account per location (via material cost type/location account control), the system defaults to writing the entire adjustment (qty summed across all locations) to the asset account indicated by the transaction location. If posted, this creates immediate discrepancy between effected GL Asset Account balances and the Stock Status by GL Report. Would like to see the system pre-fill distributions to accommodate this scenario, allowing user to choose final distribution account(s) to offset the re-valuation. Example screenshot attached.

    Resolve Cost Adjustment Issues Across Multiple Asset Accounts

    Currently, if you post a Cost Adjustment to an item that has QOH in multiple locations, with a different assigned GL Asset Account per location (via material cost type/location account control), the system defaults to writing the entire adjustment (qty summed across all locations) to the asset account indicated by the transaction location. If posted, this creates immediate discrepancy between effected GL Asset Account balances and the Stock Status by GL Report. Would like to see the system pre-fill distributions to accommodate this scenario, allowing user to choose final distribution account(s) to… more

    •  

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

17. Add Job Number to IM/AR/AP distribution files

    Add Job Number, etc. to IM/AR/AP/etc. distribution files (similar to BMDISFIL)

    The new BMDISFIL is a tremendous source of information, containing far more relevant fields from the originating transaction than the other distribution files. Would like to see the other subledger files expanded to include relevant data from the originating transaction, similar to the BMDISFIL, including but not limited to the job number.

    2 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

18. Direct Ship Orders

    Our business model is 90% direct ship orders. Right now there is no correlation between the Sales Order and the Purchase Order number which is causing us lots of issues due to the volume of orders we take. I've been told there is nothing on the table to assist with this. One idea given to me is to use the job # field for both the Sales/Purchase Order for a stop gap. That is great, but I have to run a report on the PO side in order to find the Job#. I'd like to be able to query the PO side by Job #.

    Our business model is 90% direct ship orders. Right now there is no correlation between the Sales Order and the Purchase Order number which is causing us lots of issues due to the volume of orders we take. I've been told there is nothing on the table to assist with this. One idea given to me is to use the job # field for both the Sales/Purchase Order for a stop gap. That is great, but I have to run a report on the PO side in order to find the Job#. I'd like to be able to query the… more

    3 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

19. Partially Received Purchase Order Utility

    Currently when receiving a partial shipment against a purchase order we are able to record the receipt and the PO inquiry shows the original order and received quantity correctly. This creates a "back order" quantity due on the PO. Item quantities on order fields show the back orders still open as long as the PO is not closed during receiving.

    Reprinting the PO shows the original item Quantity and extends the amounts based on the original quantity.

    It would be helpful to have a utility to reprint partially received POs showing the back order quantity and the new item extensions. This would be a big aid in both the receiving as well as invoice reconciliation process.

    Alternately, instead of a separate utility there could be an option when posting receipts to "Reprint Partially Received POs". Y/N

    Currently when receiving a partial shipment against a purchase order we are able to record the receipt and the PO inquiry shows the original order and received quantity correctly. This creates a "back order" quantity due on the PO. Item quantities on order fields show the back orders still open as long as the PO is not closed during receiving.

    Reprinting the PO shows the original item Quantity and extends the amounts based on the original quantity.

    It would be helpful to have a utility to reprint partially received POs showing the back order quantity and the new item extensions.… more

    2 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

20. Send a warning before saving a change of an econtact's email

    We had the following situation on a customer site:
    1. User intended to add a "faked" email address. This adress is added to customers that do not want to receive an email for the invoice and do not need a printed invoice. (a hard copy of the invoice is delivered and when running duplicate invoice (after posting), it is not necessary to get a hard copy or an email). This is a valid process.
    2. After adding the faked email econtct, user changed the email address to one of the real emails of this customers. This was a mistake.
    3. As a result the email of step 2 above received all the emails that went to the faked email. There were many emails and the customer was able to see other customers' invoices which is always bad.

    We changed the faked econtact details Name, Company, Address etc. to say DO NOT CHANGE THE E-MAIL !!! in order to prevent future mistake.

    A warning " Are You sure you want to change the econtact email?, This can cause a problem " or similar message, could help as well.

    We had the following situation on a customer site:
    1. User intended to add a "faked" email address. This adress is added to customers that do not want to receive an email for the invoice and do not need a printed invoice. (a hard copy of the invoice is delivered and when running duplicate invoice (after posting), it is not necessary to get a hard copy or an email). This is a valid process.
    2. After adding the faked email econtct, user changed the email address to one of the real emails of this customers. This was a mistake.
    3.… more

    2 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close